Mitchell Report: The Day After

So I’ve had a day to digest the Mitchell "Report" and my head is still spinning.  I’ve spent a large part of the past 2 days watching ESPN, checking out various blogs and columns, and listening to MLB on XM and pretty much everyone has a different opinion and a different take on this whole debacle.  Some see it as a banner day for the sport.  Some wonder what the heck the point of this all was?  Some are glad names were named.  Some don’t see the point in naming names.  Some are taking every word of the "report" to be fact.  Others see it as a bunch of hogwash and hearsay.  If you read my entry yesterday, you know I thought it was a waste of time, money, and it didn’t accomplish much except telling us what we already knew.  Steroids in baseball is a problem.  Well duh.

Like every Yankee fan out there, I want to believe that the allegations against Clemens and Pettitte are completely and utterly false.  And for all I know they are.  There’s no solid proof anywhere that either of them ever used anything.  All we have is the word of a guy pressured to give up information to stay out of prison.  In my opinion, that’s not a lot to go on.  If you were to put me on the spot and ask me if I honestly think the 2 are guilty of using, sadly, I have to say yes.  At first, I thought no way.  And then as I said yesterday, David Justice opened up his mouth.

Justice was a guest on "Yankees Hot Stove" Thursday night and he spoke out about his innocence.  He told a story about how McNamee approached him about using HGH, put HGH in Justice’s locker, and Justice gave it back because he couldn’t use needles.  This was the first time I ever heard a player openly admit that HGH was in the clubhouse.  Hearing this makes me wonder and unfortunately it makes me think McNamee is being somewhat truthful in his statements.  After all, it was Clemens who brought McNamee with him to New York.  Does anyone have any thoughts on Justice’s comments?  Am I reading too much into them?  I’m looking for someone to try and sway me away from my current train of thought, but so far, everyone I mention this to has been inclined to agree. 

Sadly, at this point, I have to believe that Clemens was doping.  He’s come out and denied the allegations but I don’t believe him at this time.  Is it possible Clemens played cleaned?  Yes.  And if he’s truly innocent, as he says he is, the only course of action he has in my opinion is to file a lawsuit against McNamee and fight this to the end.  Or maybe even take a lie detector test.  As far as I’m concerned if his only response ends up being a public statement denying the allegations, well that’s not enough for me.  If you truly didn’t do it, do what’s right, and fight to clear your name.  That’s what I would do if I were in his shoes.

So what do you think about Clemens?  Do you believe him when he proclaims he’s innocent?




    I don’t believe everything in the Mitchell Report to be true, but sadly, I have to agree with you that I think Clemens really used steroids.
    However, from a legal point of view, I don’t think the current evidences they have will stand in court.

    So just to teach Mitchell a lesson of not making accusations freely, I hope Clemens sues Mitchell.

  2. SomeBallyard

    I strongly suspected Clemens was doping before the Mitchell Report, so I believe he is guilty. I agree with you, though: if he really is innocent, Clemens has the resources to fight this and clear his name. Of course he had the opportunity to talk with Mitchell and contest the allegations before the report was even published, and he didn’t avail himself of that opportunity.

    He’s guilty as sin.

    Michael Norton – Some Clubhouse

  3. Jason

    I agree that the “report” has no leagl worth whatsoever. I don’t even think good ‘ol Bud could use to dole out any disciplinary action. The MLBPA would tear that apart.

    I’m not sure if Mitchell can be sued though. I thought I heard a leagel analyst say that he’s in the clear b/c he’s just basing the report on the testimony of others. If they can sue anyone, it’s McNamee and Radomski.

    It’s amazing how everyone believes what these guys are saying to be 100% true b/c lying to fedeal authorities is purjury. If Clemens testifies under oath that he’s never used PEDs, then what? 2 people testifying opposite stories while under oath. As the world turns.



    Oh, too bad, I thought since Mitchell wrote that report and chose to use McNamee and Radomski’s story, he would be the one Clemens could sue…

    But if Clemens really wants to clear his name, he SHOULD sue somebody, in this case, McName.

    And I think it’s stupid too to believe everyone who was mentioned really used steroids (ex. Brian Roberts. I can’t believe they had the guts to bring his name up. From what was in the report, they got nothing on him and simply speculated.). But the reason I believe Clemens is really guilty is because the story McName provided was very detailed compared with the others. Either he’s a really good story teller, or it wasn’t a story at all…

Leave a Reply to SomeBallyard Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s